Professor: Anne Parker
Department: Engineering
College: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
Rating # 1
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: No
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
She is absolutely the worst of the worst, she is very unreasonable, boring, and unprofessional. She keeps talking about professionalism, but she is extremely rude. Do not follow whatever she posts because if you do, you will still lose a ton of marks. Avoid her under any circumstance
Rating # 2
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: B+
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 2.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: No
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
I stopped wearing my seat belt on the way into class, to lessen my odds of making it there. You're gonna get a B or a C, unless you're female. Resubmitting the same assignment twice yields very different marks. Grading is arbitrary, lectures are useless, and rubrics mean nothing when you write in categories after the fact to take more marks off.
Rating # 3
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: No
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Dr. Parker may as well be responsible for the deforestation of the Amazon jungle due to her hatred for the environment and her love for having everything double spaced and printed countless times. She has made her love for Hilary Clinton and hatred for Donald Trump abundantly clear, against university policy, as her prejudice against men continues.
Rating # 4
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: B
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 1.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: No
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Hands down the worst prof I have ever had at the University of Manitoba.
Rating # 5
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
The most unclear prof I've ever had. She tells you things and then her assignments say otherwise. She's a ridiculously hard marker considering most of us are strong writers. She thinks everything she says is super critical and that her textbook is the most important book ever. Also, prepare yourself for long painful lectures.
Rating # 6
Overview:
- Course: ENG2040
- Grade Received: A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Terribly unclear prof, you will find she says that everything is critical, completely confusing you about what is actually important. Marks like it's a high level english course. AVOID AT ALL COSTS. Wait to take with a different prof.
Rating # 7
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: A+
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
She has potential to be a really good prof, I actually thought I have learned what she says in lectures. However, her lectures are a complete waste of time and do not cover important information that pertain to what she grades. Her grading is arbitrary at times, this course is an utter nightmare.
Rating # 8
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: B+
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Where to begin... Her lectures held my interest like a long-winded Nickelback song. She often contradicted herself in class. She was very unclear about what she wanted from your assignments and papers. When you asked questions, she gave you an answer that left you more confused than before. Grading seemed obscure. Turn and run.
Rating # 9
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Regardless of how hard our group worked and how many late nights we put in we came out with a B. For our first hand-in we got an A. Later that semester we handed in the same thing with another piece added and she gave us a B on it.. Shes clueless. You're going to bust your ass in this class for a C+ or a B. Unless you're a chick..
Rating # 10
Overview:
- Course: ECE2220
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Took a very long time to return papers, often you were submitting the next step before you got the corrections back on the previous. Different section with a different prof had to do 10 page report, whereas we did 50 pages. Course content needs to be updated to include more relevant engineering report-writingcontractsproper client emails.
Rating # 11
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Her class should of just been a rubric. She consistently contradicts herself in lecture, notes and her supposed bible of a textbook. Expect a B, if you earned anything more odds are she will quote one of her contradictions to change the terms of the marking.
Rating # 12
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
She has no Idea what this course is about. By far, the most dis organised lectures. Also She has no background in engineering, so I don't think she's the right person for this job. You should never take this course with her
Rating # 13
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Good luck.... Everything about dated methods and unfair marking is true.
Rating # 14
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
This prof is useless. She consistently changes her mind on everything she tells you in class. I had her for Technical Communications and she has the worst communication skills out of any teacher i've had. If it wasn't for the TA's I would have failed this class. She is stuck in the past and will not accept any assignment that looks modern.
Rating # 15
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Worst prof I've ever had. She is clearly out of touch with today's industry. Her methods are dated and if you try to deviate and think for your own, you will not be happy with your grades.
Rating # 16
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
She is a great person, very helpful and friendly towards individuals. She looks like Teddy Bear :) The only bad thing is her tough way of marking assignments.
Rating # 17
Overview:
- Course: ENG2010
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
She is awesome and cute.
Rating # 18
Overview:
- Course: TECHCOMM
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.0
- Course Difficulty: 1.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 19
Overview:
- Course: TECHCOMM
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very bad.
Rating # 20
Overview:
- Course: TECHCOMM
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
To all the textbooks, burn burn burn.... That's what you'll want to do with this $70 table-leveler. The course, and textbook, both lack clarity and direction. Ask for help and you're told to read the book. If you're a girl, however, all will be fine. You are already above the rest of the class.
No comments:
Post a Comment