Brian Thorn - Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

Professor: Brian Thorn
Department: Engineering
College: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Rating # 1
Overview:
  • Course: EIEI785
  • Grade Received: A+
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: No
  • Attendance: Not Mandatory
Comment:
I took Fund. of Sustainable Engineering with him and it was horrible, the whole course is only based on quizzes, Ive taken 8, each friday 1 (8 weeks straight), the quizzes are based on scientific articles, hard to read and understand, you have to really focus and try hard. Students missed class because the only thing that mattered were the examns
Rating # 2
Overview:
  • Course: ISEE785
  • Grade Received: B-
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: Not Mandatory
Comment:
He gave us quizzes almost weekly (when it was convenient for him to give work) that had absolutely nothing to do with what we were learning in class. Your grade is based entirely off of these quizzes that were based off of articles that you read outside of class. Got me excited about the subject, but if you care about your grade, don't take.
Rating # 3
Overview:
  • Course: EIEI785
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.5
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Found the class to be straightforward, exams were likewise, fairly easy. Course focused more on slides rather than book material. Good professor, entertaining, would def. take a class w/ him again.
Rating # 4
Overview:
  • Course: SUSTA790
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He is a good professor, but his exams and quizzes are extremely tricky, and sometimes, even him gets confused with the questions.
Rating # 5
Overview:
  • Course: DA01
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Should try harder to teach the classes and add more material. Half of every class contained a summary of the last one.
Rating # 6
Overview:
  • Course: DOE01
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
did not feel like a graduate level course. expect more efforts from him in terms of teaching.course structure is good. the content is found lacking.
Rating # 7
Overview:
  • Course: SUSTAINABILITY
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 8
Overview:
  • Course: CFORENG
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
His grading system is horrible!!! The tests are usually arbitrary and aren't really fair. It's hard to test knowledge of C++ without using a computer. His final was confusing, but he was an ok teacher, i learned a lot. The final project is also horrible, most ppl probabally spent 72+hours on it.
Rating # 9
Overview:
  • Course: COMPIE
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Hard course, very fun, and very reasonable teacher, adjusts requirments to meet class accomplishment
Discuss With Everyone:

No comments:

Post a Comment