Peter Jedicke - Fanshawe College, London, ON

Professor: Peter Jedicke

Department: Liberal Arts & Sciences

College: Fanshawe College, London, ON

Rating # 1

Overview:

• Course: PHYS1031
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: Yes
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: Not Mandatory

Comment:

Seems to talk endlessly without actually covering any material. I discussed more physics concepts on my lunch break than I've learned in 3 classes. Presents ideas in a scattered manner and laced with irrelevant and sexist personal opinions.

Rating # 2

Overview:

• Course: PHYS1028
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Terrible teacher. Babbles on for hours about irrelevant useless information. Takes weeks to grade assignments. Shows up minimum 5 minutes late to every class. Only teaches 2 classes and clearly can't handle that. Time to retire Pete.

Rating # 3

Overview:

• Course: MATH2009
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Peter's intelligence is far above the level he's teaching at. You can tell he's frustrated with the boring, simple curicculum he's paid to teach, so he spices the lessons up with some awesome conceptual perspectives. The guy would make an awesome philosophy professor as well. I'd bet money that the next Stephen Hawking will be mentored by Peter.

Rating # 4

Overview:

• Course: MATH2004
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.5
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

The best math teacher I've ever had so far.

Rating # 5

Overview:

• Course: PHYSICS
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Amazing teacher. The people who gave bad reviews of his physics class are likely tools. All Pete wants to do is get you motivated, passionate, and interested - and he achieves this in spades. The man breathes science. Proof? Ask him about the numbers on his shirts. Textbook one of the most coherent I've read. He fueled my love affair with Physics

Rating # 6

Overview:

• Course: MATH2004
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.5
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Too smart to teach college math, tries to make you smarter and better at math and teaches like a real math teacher not a gym teacher! He's tough but fair, but you MUST go to class and ask for help early. He has no sympathy for slackers.

Rating # 7

Overview:

• Course: MATH2004
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 1.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Personally, I loved his class and found that he explained things in a way that made it very easy to understand. He comes of a little arrogant, but if you take it with a grain of salt, the course is enjoyable and he's willing to help if you're willing to put in the effort.

Rating # 8

Overview:

• Course: MATH2004
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.5
• Course Difficulty: 1.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Good Teacher, gets off topic, and gets way too exited about math... but I understand when he is teaching. almost fell asleep in his class a couple times though.

Rating # 9

Overview:

• Course: INFO102
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

If it were not for his voice, I think he may have kept me awake and interested more. The lowness of his voice seemed a bit hypnotizing, especially for an after-lunch class. Whenever he would start talking about astronomy, it would take him forever to get back on topic. That was always cool. Also, I will never forget the pastel colors and the glasse

Rating # 10

Overview:

• Course: INFOSOMETHING
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

This guy needs to learn how to reach the students better.

Rating # 11

Overview:

• Course: PHYSICS
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.0
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Found Peter to be arrogant. Seems to be trying to make up for not being the famous brother. Cold in one on one conversations, but exceptionally smart (or at least he acts like it). Seemed to care little about his students at the time. Knows much about astronomy...great resource for that.

Rating # 12

Overview:

• Course: INFO141
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I get the impression that he didn't hit home with people. In my opinion I thought his way of thinking was interesting and he spoke about things which may be thought of as trivial.

Rating # 13

Overview:

• Course: INFO140
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I wonder which shirt to where today? Pastal pink or yellow? Super geek...knows too much for his own good

Rating # 14

Overview:

• Course: MATH
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Great philosophy teacher. TOO BAD WE WERE TAKING MATH.

Rating # 15

Overview:

• Course: ETHICS
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 1.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

A pseudo intellectual. Logical fallacies and pedestrian conclusions (when not blatantly culled from other, known dissertations). College, eh?

Rating # 16

Overview:

• Course: PHY136
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

He made physics interesting and got to know the students, exceptional in postsecondary education.

Rating # 17

Overview:

• Course: INFO121
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

No Comments

Rating # 18

Overview:

• Course: MATH
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.5
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Best math teacher ever. We all wish we were as smart.

Rating # 19

Overview:

• Course: INFO290
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 1.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Nice teacher, smart

Rating # 20

Overview:

• Course: MATH063
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.5
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Good guy.