Steven Kellman - University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Professor: Steven Kellman

Department: English

College: University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

Rating # 1

Overview:

• Course: ENG3123
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: Yes
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: No
• Attendance: Mandatory

Comment:

Everything is "scintillating", unless you're one of the students who hasn't followed him from class to class. Even if it is an upper-level class, unless it's the only class you're taking, there's no way to get through the amount of reading between classes. Very condescending if your opinion differs from his. Would not recommend to anyone.

Rating # 2

Overview:

• Course: ENG3033
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: Yes
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: Yes
• Attendance: Mandatory

Comment:

Honestly this class is not that hard. This is an upper division English course, so yes, it does require reading and that you pay attention. Quizzes are always announced and if you did the reading they shouldn't be hard. Critical thinking is important when it comes to the essays, but this professor is not unreasonable and is happy to give feedback.

Rating # 3

Overview:

• Course: ENG4973
• Grade Received: B
• Overall Rating: 3.0
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: Yes
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: Mandatory

Comment:

I enjoyed most of Kellman's lectures, but I do agree at times he can come off as condescending, especially the way he says "mmmhhmm" when someone makes a comment I guess he finds unhelpful. As for the class layout, he'll quiz on every novel, have 2 papers, an individual presentation, and a final. It's a lot, but doable if you put in the work.

Rating # 4

Overview:

• Course: ENG5753
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Writing that earns an A in other classes will be lucky to receive a B in Dr. Kellman's class. If you're not worried about your GPA then take one of his classes - you'll be enriched. And writing an A paper for him is possible, but your argument has to be VERY strong and clear. Also, ask him to clarify assignments.

Rating # 5

Overview:

• Course: ENG3123
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Great class but you MUST read the books. Professor is VERY knowledgeable and expects his students to know a little too much (sometimes making it hard to follow). Be prepared for weekly quizzes and the use of direct quotes on tests and quizzes.

Rating # 6

Overview:

• Course: ENG4973
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.0
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

It's NOT that bad. There is a lot of reading BUT I did about 70% of it and got a B. He's going to be smarter than you, it's a given and some students couldn't stand that. I feel smarter for hearing his lectures. He's kind of "out there" but interesting. Bring a pillow to sit on, it drags a bit.

Rating # 7

Overview:

• Course: ENG4973
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.5
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Do not take this prof. If you don't share his opinions on things, you will struggle to pass. If you have a brown nose you will do fine. He is a very smart man, but he is a poor instructor. He is fairly nice in class, but in private, his personality leaves a lot to be desired. If you want an A, then treat him like the god's gift he thinks he is.

Rating # 8

Overview:

• Course: AMLIT3000
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.0
• Course Difficulty: 4.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Kellman is deserving of every compliment. He's a great professor and cares about students' learning. He does, however, have strong ideas that often don't mesh with the students. He's an excellent writer and poet. I would take him again. YOU WILL WORK HARD!

Rating # 9

Overview:

• Course: AMERLIT
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Really good class, he is very intelligent, and is a wealth of knowledge. I did feel a little like it was his way or no way at all. It seems he has very specific ideas about literature (and all this entails)?not that this is a bad thing, just a certain view. If you take his class, you will be challenged (but also learn a lot).

Rating # 10

Overview:

• Course: ENG3033
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I don't understand why there are so many bad comments. He's a great prof. There's a lot of reading and he tells you ahead of time when he'll quiz you. If you read, you're good. His test are hard...if you don't read. Mostly fill in the blanks and multiple choice. I would take him again if I had the chance.

Rating # 11

Overview:

• Course: ENG5953
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.5
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

lovely, lovely, man.

Rating # 12

Overview:

• Course: ENG4903
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 5.0
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I truly enjoyed this class.I find him easy to understand ,lucid,well read and competent in the subject. I would look forward to another class.One must do the reading though.

Rating # 13

Overview:

• Course: HUM3403
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: No
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

He is NOT a good professor. He doesn't give any feedback to any comments made in class unless it's negative. He's very arrogant and isn't clear in his instructions for the midterm or final. I would NOT take a class with him again.

Rating # 14

Overview:

• Course: ENG2013
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: Yes
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I don't like my grade being decided by hard 10 question quizes.(which is about 50-60% of grade).

Rating # 15

Overview:

• Course: LIT
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

I love lit but this class was awful. I hated going to class, but absenses count big time..he was boring and class dragged by, I don't suggest taking this class.

Rating # 16

Overview:

• Course: MODERNFICTION
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 2.5
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Don't expect an A in this class. It's not gonna happen.

Rating # 17

Overview:

• Course: LITCRIT
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 1.0
• Course Difficulty: 5.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Hard to decide if his arrogance or his pettiness is his dominant trait! You won't have any trouble as long as you completely lack self-esteem and unwaiveringly worship his omnipotent self-image. I would rather pump porta-potties for a living than take another class from him! AVOID!!!

Rating # 18

Overview:

• Course: LITCRITANLY
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.5
• Course Difficulty: 2.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

come prepared to class and read the work given carefully b/c quizzes are very detailed nice man and as a female never felt as though he was "anti" at times boring but for the most part he is decent and very knowledgable you will gain alot with him

Rating # 19

Overview:

• Course: MODERNFICTION
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 3.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Kellman is not only a boring aesthete, but a very limited scholar. Homeboy is an old-school, formalis t reader. He is totally unfamiliar with contemporary theory--including feminist and critical race theory. His lectures are often digressive and uninspired. Genius my ass.

Rating # 20

Overview:

• Course: FILM
• Grade Received: N/A
• Overall Rating: 4.0
• Course Difficulty: 3.0

• For Credit: N/A
• Textbook Used: N/A
• Would Take Again: N/A
• Attendance: N/A

Comment:

Anti Female? I didn't feel that at all from him. He's simply a teacher who expects you to put forth a genuine effort and he is very fair.I did notice that he said Umm Hmm when people said stupid things.