Professor: Klaus Schmidt-Rohr
Department: Chemistry
College: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Rating # 1
Overview:
- Course: CHEM15B
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: No
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Avoid this man. He's boring, he's terrible at explaining things, he constantly talks trash about other academics or textbooks, he focuses on the trivial parts of the material while insufficiently teaching the important stuff. He teaches freshmen like they're colleagues who make stupid mistakes. He curves decently, but the process will be painful.
Rating # 2
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Don't take his class
Rating # 3
Overview:
- Course: CHEM325
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.5
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Lectures can be very boring but he teaches the material well. He has a slight accent but it's hardly noticeable compared to many ISU professors. His hw assignments are really helpful for learning the material as they break large questions into small steps to teach you. Tests are hard but they're consistent with the material and he curves every test
Rating # 4
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
A great teacher. Relevant applications and useful knowledge. Uses blackboard very well.
Rating # 5
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.5
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He isn't that bad of a teacher. He knows what he is talking about. The besides being Chemistry it isn't a bad class.
Rating # 6
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 1.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He does a great job of teaching and I think his tests are very easy.
Rating # 7
Overview:
- Course: 165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
constant lecture, its sucks
Rating # 8
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Was hard tester, but curves it so you end up all right!
Rating # 9
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Decent professor, he lectures the whole hour on the board like an effcient German teaching machine. Lecture is boring, but he explains the concepts fairly well.
Rating # 10
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.0
- Course Difficulty: 2.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Relates concepts of chemistry to engineering well. But doesn't emphasize important information enough for the exam. Has accent but easy to understand. Overall does a good job at explaining concepts.
Rating # 11
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Lectures are very boring. Not sure what he is talking about and don't care. Can figure it out in recitation.
Rating # 12
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 2.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very good at preparing students for the exams. Has a bit of an accent, but not hard to understand at all. Relating chem concepts to engineering very entertaining. I've learned a lot about concrete, explosives, etc. Will take time to answer ?'s.
Rating # 13
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He's all about **** memorization. Hard to understand in class, and explains things very poorly, in attempts to relate things to engineering.
Rating # 14
Overview:
- Course: CHEM165
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment