Professor: Stephen Gill
Department: Political Science
College: York University (all campuses), Toronto, ON
Rating # 1
Overview:
- Course: POLS4287
- Grade Received: A+
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: Yes
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Show up, do the readings, and put in some effort. If can can manage those three basic behaviours, Prof Gill will provide feedback and guidance required for you to get an A. He is not afraid to give very high grades. World class scholar with a huge number of publications. Impressing him & earning a recommendation letter will be a boon to grad apps
Rating # 2
Overview:
- Course: POLS4287
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: Yes
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
very knowledgeable and forward thinking has written books
Rating # 3
Overview:
- Course: POLS4290
- Grade Received: A
- Overall Rating: 3.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: Yes
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: Yes
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
He is a very knowledgeable prof but for a summer course there were too many readings. Also, for a summer class there was too much work. We had 3 papers, out of which 2 were short papers and one was a group project. There weren't any exams but since its a mix of online and in class session it compulsory to participate.
Rating # 4
Overview:
- Course: POLISCI
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very rude.
Rating # 5
Overview:
- Course: FACS
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Too unclear
Rating # 6
Overview:
- Course: POLS
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 2.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very knowledgeable and is great as a scholar, but should not teach at all. Very arrogant, in love with himself, not approachable and helpful at all in any way; he will make sure that you read mostly his works; pleads to be original, but in fact his theory is a reformulation of Robert Cox's ideas;
Rating # 7
Overview:
- Course: POLISCI
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 8
Overview:
- Course: INTREL
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 1.5
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He is too wordy. Uses too many big words to make students think he is a professional.
Rating # 9
Overview:
- Course: POLS2100
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.5
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He should just say what he means in his lectures.
No comments:
Post a Comment