Eric Wheeler - York University (all campuses), Toronto, ON

Professor: Eric Wheeler
Department: Computer Science
College: York University (all campuses), Toronto, ON
Rating # 1
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4100
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Prof. Wheeler is certainly one of the best profs I've ever had because he cares in students being successful. It's fun studying computational linguistics because we get to apply everyday human language (syntax, semantics) with the tools we are familiar with in Java.
Rating # 2
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1620
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Took this class in Sum05. Java isn' easy, be warned & if like me, u have not programmed, it will be tricky, but if you put the time in, u will do well. His examples are good and he offers extra credit. This class had 6 exams which split the course up really well and forced u to learn. I think negative comments unfair, good prof, huge experience.
Rating # 3
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1620
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
I think he made this course harder than it suppose to be. His final exam in April 2005 was something that you would have never expected going in. Most of the final exam was graphical, and I think the stuff he puts on is more suitable in a 1630 course.
Rating # 4
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1630
  • Grade Received: A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Even though he cant teach well, his marking and tests are very easy...i would personally recommend that you take 1630 with him as it will be very easy to get an A if you work a little bit !
Rating # 5
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1011
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Great prof for this course, but had him for 1630 and he sucked. Take 1011 with him for sure, but not for programming.
Rating # 6
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC16201630
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Don't bother asking for clarification during his tests. His answer will always be "try your best". Overall I liked this class, I took 1620 with him and made sure I took 1630 with him as well.
Rating # 7
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1620
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He is not good at all. He never goes into details of java syntax. He only lectures from the book and briefly goes over the coding examples from the book. Overall he is a bad professor. What do you expect when York hires contract fill in professors.
Rating # 8
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1620
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Not Flexible. Exams are of much higher level than level taught in class. They say students are responsible for their own learning. Why then does York have such high tuition fees? We can study from text books and just write exams, no need for profs. Reduce tuition fees, and make it a fair system.
Rating # 9
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC2010
  • Grade Received: A+
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 10
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
expect word to word (in tiny detail) from the book for the exams, admin rules for assignment is a pain in the ass, stu w/bad-memory better not take his course, if you like memorize the text and less thinking, go for him
Rating # 11
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
This guy follows the text book more then the BIBLE! ENTIRE COURSE IS STRAIGHT FROM THE BOOK! And he wants WORD TO WORD ANSWERS! A 4th yr course you would think he would be an easy marker, HELL NO! Oh, and believes that your OVERALL GPA DOESNT MATTER!!
Rating # 12
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1630
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
he claims to mark ez, but when the time comes, he doesn't. his lec's are actually useless, better to read txt. Oh, and if you got the worse of 2 txts, ur hopeless. he writes random thoughts which is usless
Rating # 13
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Good guy, fair on the marking, lectures were quite useless if you follow the book, but overall a good prof.
Rating # 14
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.5
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
no notes but follow the book closely; exam is straight forward but need to study the whole book word to word; good on grading
Rating # 15
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1630
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
he's a funny guy, easy to follow, digresses a bit every now and then and his marking system is fairly solid. Not bad overall. he'd look younger if he shaved off the santa beard :p
Rating # 16
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC4010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Great prof...very useful as well...has lots of field experience behind him!
Rating # 17
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC2010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
This guy is the best, interesting lectures, easy assignments, and exams too. Do take his class.
Rating # 18
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1620
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.5
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
real concept in programming
Rating # 19
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC2010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Cool ex-IBM dude!
Rating # 20
Overview:
  • Course: ITEC1010
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
not helpful at all! goes off topic too much!!!
Discuss With Everyone:

No comments:

Post a Comment