William Wheeler - Clark College, Vancouver, WA

Professor: William Wheeler
Department: Engineering
College: Clark College, Vancouver, WA
Rating # 1
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR261
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Basically what everyone else has said. Slides from book etc. Seems like he had an interesting career and if he went deeper into his experiences the class would be more fun. Hopefully he reads these, he has potential to be a great instructor. Grades well and gives feedback on homework. Teach yourself and you'll be fine.
Rating # 2
Overview:
  • Course: ENG119
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
he is boring and not interesting at all doesnt explain things well just read off the book...
Rating # 3
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR109
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Wheeler is very boring and uninterested in his material or students. This is was an intro class but he could've at least faked some fun. Can't explain anything well.
Rating # 4
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR104
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Literally copies slide material straight out of text book and reads straight from slide. Has no idea what he's reading. Seems friendly in class but cold and unhelpful one on one.
Rating # 5
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Horrible teacher. Not only can I spell and speak better, but I have an idea of social interaction. This man has no clue how to interact with student helpfully, is a hard ass, and is not even truly interested in what he is teaching. Dont recommend this class with Wheeler.
Rating # 6
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Poor math skills. Uses slides from the book to teach. Finishing the slide show is his main goal. Attending class is pointless if you have the textbook. Does not have mastery of course material. Needs pre-written solutions to solve problems in class. Explanations are unclear, and unorganized. Not meant to be a teacher. Expect to teach yourself.
Rating # 7
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111211
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Nice guy but seems to have trouble thinking on his feet. If his notes or slides are wrong, he gets a little befuddled.
Rating # 8
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Boring! Lectures everyday from slides that are copied out of the book. Even his comics are copied out of the book! Not very helpful. Unclear questions on the exams. Requires group work for half the class.
Rating # 9
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Great person, but not great at teaching. I'm sure he's proficient as an engineer. Lectured straight out of book & overhead. Not very understanding if someone in your group disappears with materials or not. Would have been easier to pick our own groups that worked with our own schedules. Would have been fine at a university, not here.
Rating # 10
Overview:
  • Course: CADD150
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Great instructor. Knowledgable and friendly. People need to remember, this is a college course and not an amusement park.
Rating # 11
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
okay teacher
Rating # 12
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
He seemed to have a good grasp of the material but was very bland and boring. Students were anxious to learn, but he didn't care to guide them. Instead, he chose to work towards preventing the intellectual growth of his pupils. Not helpful at all.
Rating # 13
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
His lectures were a little bland and he just copied things from his notes to the board without even knowing what he was copying. A group member of mine plagarized our project and he had zero sympathy and failed to help us resolve the problem and only gave us a day to redo it, no help at all.
Rating # 14
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.5
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
nice guy. Not very intresting in lectures. Very helpful with information and great with out of class help. Easy with hw and tests.
Rating # 15
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR261
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
also had him for eng 111 a year b4 261. teaching style has improved a little. lectures aren't very interesting, altho he tries. doesn't seem to know his stuff, and doesn't care to help students with the material. tests are open book and pretty easy.
Rating # 16
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR261
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Absolutely no regard for personal success of students; incompetent; dull as powder. Helpful outside class, but it's all a show. He couldn't care less about his students. I got an excellent grade in this class, but not because of teacher.
Rating # 17
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
nice enough guy, but i wouldn't take any more classes w/ him. Doesn't always understand material, and lectures directly from the text, overheads and all. not very understanding if you are sick and miss class, etc.
Rating # 18
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very proficient as an engineer, but not as a teacher.
Rating # 19
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR111
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Relativly new and has potential. Needs to liven up his lectures. Very willing to help during office hours.
Rating # 20
Overview:
  • Course: ENGR110
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Clear and thorough. Not very exicting, could use more of his own experiences in his teaching. All in all, not bad. Has the potential to be a great teacher.
Discuss With Everyone:

No comments:

Post a Comment