Rick Searle - University of Victoria

Professor: Rick Searle
Department: TBD
College: University of Victoria
Rating # 1
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: B-
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: No
  • Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
Side note: contacted my work place and was rude
Rating # 2
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
uses powerpoint. essay is marked fairly. final is fair. dont really need textbook. lots of material to learn but he cuts off a chunk of it for final. average prof with fair marking.
Rating # 3
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Rick is a reaally nice guy and is extremely passionate about the course, and he is not that tough of a marker. It was not a difficult course, but not very interesting. You should only take this course if you want to work in parks.
Rating # 4
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Great prof! Really interesting lectures, he knows his stuff! Hard marker, but very helpful when approached.
Rating # 5
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG455
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Intelligent, well-spoken. Energetic. Courses tackle "norms and controversies" involving Canadian national, provincial and muncipal parks, forestry and wildlife issues-delivered with a realistic and humanitarian edge. Attentive to students' individual abilities,interests, needs and progress. Don't mistake (his) shared experiences with arrogance.
Rating # 6
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.5
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Seems nice in class until you get a paper back and he tells you how retarded you are.
Rating # 7
Overview:
  • Course: GEOGES
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very good - some courses hard others easy.
Rating # 8
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Sooooo full of himself! I can not believe his sessions are renewed, can't the dept find anyone else??? Nice how he pushes his own book-Just read Phil.D's book instead!
Rating # 9
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Really nice guy, passionate about the subject, but marks extremely hard, to make it look like his course is not a joke? Arrogance gets irritating at times.
Rating # 10
Overview:
  • Course: GEOG357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 5.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very nice guy. Passionate about what he teaches. Enjoyed the class!
Rating # 11
Overview:
  • Course: 357
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Seems like a nice guy BUT turns out to be a knowledge but arrogant bag of wind when it comes to the teaching process. Who cares about the TV station you work for?????
Discuss With Everyone:

No comments:

Post a Comment