Professor: John H. McDowell
Department: TBD
College: University of Pittsburgh
Rating # 1
Overview:
- Course: WITTGENST
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.0
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: No
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Definitely better than Brandom!
Rating # 2
Overview:
- Course: PHIL2886
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 4.5
- Course Difficulty: 4.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: Yes
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Very intelligent man. Always addresses questions seriously even if the question is seemingly pointless or unrelated- he'll never make you feel dumb but sometimes a class can get bogged down by silly questions. He tends to repeat himself. He has an unbelievable amount of knowledge and insight about his material. He's also fantasticly helpful.
Rating # 3
Overview:
- Course: WITTGENSTEIN
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 2.5
- Course Difficulty: 5.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: Not Mandatory
Comment:
Zzzzzzzzz. Easily the most boring prof I've ever had. The classes were so bad I would stare at my watch and beg the time to go faster. Pretty hard grader too; his grading is largely opaque - you see relatively few comments and then get to the last page and there's just a grade there. Joy.
Rating # 4
Overview:
- Course: 1225
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.5
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Long-winded but interesting. Has a tendency to talk a lot but open to discussion. Material is very difficult at times but he's willing to work with you. Fair grader and a very nice guy. One of the most well-known at Pitt, too. Recommended.
Rating # 5
Overview:
- Course: WITTGENSTEIN
- Grade Received: A
- Overall Rating: 2.5
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: Mandatory
Comment:
As far as the Pitt phil. profs go, he is about average. His lectures were repetitious and monotone and I don't think he was an easy grader. I also found him to be pretty aloof and not that interested in undergrads.
Rating # 6
Overview:
- Course: PHIL
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 5.0
- Course Difficulty: 1.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Better than Brandom
Rating # 7
Overview:
- Course: PHIL
- Grade Received: N/A
- Overall Rating: 3.0
- Course Difficulty: 3.0
- For Credit: N/A
- Textbook Used: N/A
- Would Take Again: N/A
- Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Not a bad professor; not a very hard grader but class is extremely boring & he tends to ramble.
No comments:
Post a Comment