Melanie Campbell - University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON

Professor: Melanie Campbell
Department: Science
College: University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
Rating # 1
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Prof. Melanie Campbell, as a lecturer, was around average. Her slides can be slightly disorganized sometimes but she is excellent in answering questions when you ask her. She is also willing to go through trouble to help you if you seek it. Her exams are fair and if you did your assignments well, then you should be prepared for the exams.
Rating # 2
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 2.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: Yes
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: Not Mandatory
Comment:
Absolutely horrible prof. Her slides are all over the place, just like the stuff she posts on LEARN
Rating # 3
Overview:
  • Course: PHY001
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
She knew what she was talking about, and expanded my field of interest. Seriously, the things she has done are amazing.
Rating # 4
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
I really loved this class. Sure it was at 8:30 and no one bothered going to class, but this teacher is really nice! I missed 2 weeks of classes and fell behind. When I emailed her she arranged one-on-one meetings with her to catch up. She was really helpful! The assignments were hard but everything was curved so I got a good mark :)
Rating # 5
Overview:
  • Course: PHY256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: Yes
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Course Evaluation favors this professor. My theory is, the half of the class who decide not to attend the class would have given her straight Es in teaching quality section. Fortunately,this did not happen, because only those who tolerate her lectures still went to her class on course evaluation day.
Rating # 6
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 2.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
This is more like a grade-9 math class. By the time she grind through one equation, I probably have finished 8-10 games of minesweeper. Unique math notations she uses are meant to waste your time asking her.
Rating # 7
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS445
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Sitting in her class watching her trying to teach using ppt I kept wishing ?kill me now?. She did very little to teach, instead she regurgitated equations, note-taking in that class is unnecessary.
Rating # 8
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS10
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 4.0
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
She did an excellent job of organizing speakers and tours for Physics Seminar. Thanks to her leadership, we were able to visit both Perimeter Institute and Institute for Quantum Computing. When we had questions relating to her presentations, she was more than willing to help us.
Rating # 9
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 3.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
I might be the only one to say something positive about her, but at least i give her credit for trying. The materials were straightforward, and her tests were fair. So there's no reason to complain even though she's not exactly the perfect lecturer.
Rating # 10
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.5
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: No
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Unorganized, messy notes, better off learning from he text and wikipedia, she can't teach period.
Rating # 11
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 3.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
Learn the material yourself using the presentations/PDFs from the website and the textbook (she takes EVERYTHING from the text anyways) ... all she does is confuse you during lectures with her messy examples. The course itself is straightforward to learn yourself; just ignore her.
Rating # 12
Overview:
  • Course: OPTOMETRY
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 5.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 13
Overview:
  • Course: PHYS256
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 4.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
No Comments
Rating # 14
Overview:
  • Course: OPTICS
  • Grade Received: N/A
  • Overall Rating: 1.0
  • Course Difficulty: 1.0
  • For Credit: N/A
  • Textbook Used: N/A
  • Would Take Again: N/A
  • Attendance: N/A
Comment:
unapproachable,unclear and stupid enough to give take home exams
Discuss With Everyone:

No comments:

Post a Comment